<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Freeware</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danutu.wordpress.com/freeware/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danutu.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Just another piece of... pie :D</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:51:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan S.</title>
		<link>http://danutu.wordpress.com/freeware/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 13:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danutu.wordpress.com/freeware/#comment-24</guid>
		<description>tnx :D
avast-ul e intradevar cam amarat si jigarit dar tot e mai bun decat nimic :P l-am testat in o retea infectata la greu cu troieni si alte &quot;bunatati&quot; si a rezistat cu brio. ce-i drept, nu se compara cu produse de marca precum kaspersky (favoritul meu personal).
ideea cu utorrent &amp; bitcomet e foarte buna si o voi lua in considerare pentru un articol viitor. ceea ce stiu sigur este ca multe site-uri respectabile de torrente recomanda sau impun folosirea utorrent.
cat despre firefox &amp; iexplo(d)er nu prea e ce de zis. cel putin nu cred ca mai pot aduce ceva nou. ffox rulz :))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tnx <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
avast-ul e intradevar cam amarat si jigarit dar tot e mai bun decat nimic <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' />  l-am testat in o retea infectata la greu cu troieni si alte &#8220;bunatati&#8221; si a rezistat cu brio. ce-i drept, nu se compara cu produse de marca precum kaspersky (favoritul meu personal).<br />
ideea cu utorrent &amp; bitcomet e foarte buna si o voi lua in considerare pentru un articol viitor. ceea ce stiu sigur este ca multe site-uri respectabile de torrente recomanda sau impun folosirea utorrent.<br />
cat despre firefox &amp; iexplo(d)er nu prea e ce de zis. cel putin nu cred ca mai pot aduce ceva nou. ffox rulz <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vd88</title>
		<link>http://danutu.wordpress.com/freeware/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>vd88</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 12:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danutu.wordpress.com/freeware/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>prea multe de citit dar...trust him.
se intampla ca la internet ce e free e si cel mai bun (firefox si utorrent) sau se intampla sa fie si cel mai slab (avast).
P.S. ar trebui sa scrii o pag numa despre utorrent vs bitcomet sau despre firefox vs :D ieXplorer :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>prea multe de citit dar&#8230;trust him.<br />
se intampla ca la internet ce e free e si cel mai bun (firefox si utorrent) sau se intampla sa fie si cel mai slab (avast).<br />
P.S. ar trebui sa scrii o pag numa despre utorrent vs bitcomet sau despre firefox vs <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  ieXplorer <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
